What do you think?
- Dr. John Nay
- Professor
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2003 7:34 am
- Location: Prescott Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
Slow
Sorry, as I'm sure you'll agree, I can be a little slow.
By the way, there may not be many that post, but there are well over 300 visits to the forums each month --- several are from other countries. My purpose for taking time with this is that some (even one) will come to know Jesus as Lord.
John
- Dr. John Nay
- Professor
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2003 7:34 am
- Location: Prescott Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
Lucy & Reasonable Faith
Jukia
I must not be making myself clear, i.e. the comment about Lucy is NOT MY COMMENT, it?s the comment of Donald Johanson, a prominent evolutionist.
Again, I must not be making myself clear, as I believe that God did NOT leave man in a position where he could not determine what is or is not true, He gave us His Word --- the Bible.
I did not say that man is not to use his intellect to understand the world around him. as I believe that intellect is a facet of being created in the image of God (Gen. 1:26ff.). I believe that there needs to be a standard, i.e. a measuring device of some type to determine what is or is not true. For me it?s God?s Word. Based upon the things that I do understand, I accept on faith the things that I do not understand in God?s Word. My view that the Bible is from God is not based on blind faith, but the use of the intellectual capability that I received from God. The bottom line is that I have a compass for my passage through this life, it?s God?s Holy Spirit coupled with His inspired Word.
So I take it you believe the entire universe was created in 6 literal days about 6000 +/- years ago there was a world wide flood, and that while there may have been some microevolution within "kinds", you do not believe the generally accepted scientific ideas that the universe is 15 billion + years old, earth 4.5+/- years old and life as we know it has evolved from other living things.
Is that pretty much a correct statement?
Is that pretty much a correct statement?
- Dr. John Nay
- Professor
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2003 7:34 am
- Location: Prescott Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
Almost Agree!
At last, we almost agree!! I.e., relative to your statement being correct, although I place the Flood of Genesis very close to 2345 BC, not 4000 or so BC.
Last edited by Dr. John Nay on Mon Dec 13, 2004 6:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Dr. John Nay
- Professor
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2003 7:34 am
- Location: Prescott Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
Truth
IF truth is relative to perception, we're both correct. Of course I do not believe that truth is relative to perception.
- Dr. John Nay
- Professor
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2003 7:34 am
- Location: Prescott Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
Truth
True.